← Intergenerational transmission

Transmission · Framework

Family governance the structure that carries intention

Without a frame, the best intentions dilute at the moment of mourning. Family governance — charter, access rules, roles — turns emotion into an operable structure.

Family charter: the frame, not the substitute

A family charter often defines principles, decision bodies, exit rules, sometimes the ethics of the house. It remains the domain of your notaries, lawyers and family officers.

Aigyros completes that frame on the cognitive plane: who may consult what, when, under which conditions — the charter applied at Sanctuary scale.

What intangible governance must settle

• Which heirs access which deposits — and at which moment in their life
• What remains under the Depository's duty of reserve
• How rights evolve if the family expands or restructures
• Who arbitrates in case of doubt — without replacing the judge or notary

Avoiding improvised governance

Too many families draft in the urgency of death. That is the scenario in why transmissions fail: clear assets, missing rules, conflict over meaning.

Anticipating means writing the frame while the founder can still explain the why — and link it to values and rituals.

Coordinating the actors

The right model: your advisors structure the material and legal charter; Aigyros constitutes and governs the cognitive. Both workstreams run in parallel, never in competition.

During successions, the Sanctuary is secured and the Sovereign Essence delivered to beneficiaries under your directives — not under the improvisation of the moment.

Frequently asked questions

Does Aigyros replace a family charter?

No. The charter remains with your advisors. Aigyros materialises the intention and memory that make that governance living and queryable by authorised heirs.

Can access differ between heirs?

Yes. That is the core of native governance: each heir accesses only what you authorise, when you authorise it.